The Binance cryptocurrency exchange platform is amongst the safest exchanges in the world. However, this has been made more difficult for exchanges as a result of the Monetary Authority of Singapore's (MAS) unwillingness to give licenses. However, if lots of people looking to sell that coin, it will be easy to buy. A limit order is an order to buy or sell an asset at a specific price or better. Let us take an example to understand the scenario better. To extend an example use case by Ruben Somsen from the thread, the idea would be to allow 100 users to each attach to their emails a proof that $1 of bitcoins had been burned, providing the type of anti-spam protection originally envisioned as a benefit of hashcash. He provides blockspace calculations for each output type and concludes the process would take about 11,500 blocks. ● How much blockspace would it take to spend the complete UTXO set? ● What is the largest multisig quorum currently possible? ● Proof of micro-burn: several developers discussed use cases and designs of onchain transactions that destroy bitcoins ("burn" bitcoins) in small increments as a proof of resource consumption.

23480 updates the output script descriptor language with a rawtr() descriptor for referring to the exposed key in a taproot output in cases where either the key is used without a tweak (not recommended, see BIP341) or when the internal key and scripts aren’t known (which can be unsafe; see the PR comments or

the documentation added by this PR for details). A previous proposal, BIP322, to provide fully generic message signing that could work with any script has not yet been merged into Bitcoin Core or added to any other popular wallet of which we’re aware. ● What are packages in Bitcoin Core and what is their use case? Bitcoin Core doesn’t support signing or verifying arbitrary messages for any other address type, including addresses covering single-sig P2SH-P2WPKH, native P2WPKH, and P2TR outputs. The second address would be for internal payments within the wallet, namely returning change back to the wallet after spending a UTXO. 1001 recommends that nodes who advertise a change to their payment forwarding policies continue accepting payments received using the old policies for about 10 minutes. Implementing interactive funding moves Eclair closer to support for dual funding which allows funds to be contributed to a new channel by either of the nodes participating in that channel.

2273 implements the proposed interactive funding protocol where two LN nodes coordinate more closely to open a new payment channel. Peers are authorized using runes, which is a custom CLN protocol based on a simplified version of macaroons. Several solutions were discussed using merkle trees, although one respondent suggested that the small amounts involved suggest that having participants trust (or partially trust) a centralized third party may be a reasonable way to avoid unnecessary complexity. He suggested limiting the BIP to just two paths and waiting for anyone needing additional paths to write their own BIP. A delegated signer can always spend the UTXO onchain without needing permission from the trusted third party, arguably making statechains less trusted than federated sidechains. Bitcoin does not support BLS signatures and a soft fork would be required to add them, but Fournier links to a paper he co-authored that describes how information can be securely extracted from a BLS signature and used with Bitcoin-compatible signature adaptors without any changes to Bitcoin. As with current DLC contracts, the oracle would not know which onchain transactions were based on its BLS signatures. 25351 ensures that after an import of addresses, keys, or descriptors to a wallet, the subsequent rescan will not only scan the blockchain but also evaluate whether transactions in the mempool are relevant to the wallet.

There are a few different types of wallets, and the best bitcoin wallet largely depends on how you plan to use bitcoin, what your risk tolerance is, and how much time and energy you want to put into securing your bitcoin. ● You receive a message saying ‘withdrawal suspended due to risk control’ and have been trying to unlock your account. ● Mining stale low-difficulty blocks as a DoS attack Andrew Chow explains that assumevalid and more recently nMinimumChainWork help filter out low-difficulty chain attacks. Rusnak also asked whether a single descriptor should be able to describe more than two related paths. If you’d like to read more about it, check out What is the RSI Indicator? Decentralized Bitcoin Mixers utilize protocols like CoinJoin that connect other users via peer-to-peer on the same protocol to combine and then redistribute the Bitcoins. User andrewz asks why assigned BIP numbers BIP40 for Stratum wire protocol and BIP41 for Stratum mining protocol have no content. Bitcoin just doesn't have that. This week’s newsletter describes a proposal to allow multiple derivation paths in a single output script descriptor and includes our regular section with summaries of notable changes to popular Bitcoin infrastructure projects. Its release notes note that it includes breaking API changes but also numerous new features and bug fixes, including support for compact block relay data structures (BIP152) and improvements to taproot and PSBT support.